↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Randomized Controlled Trial Of Lichtenstein Repair Of Indirect Inguinal Hernias With Two Biologic Meshes From Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Randomized Controlled Trial Of Lichtenstein Repair Of Indirect Inguinal Hernias With Two Biologic Meshes From Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s208185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Sun, Jie Chen, Yingmo Shen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#926
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,292
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.