↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cognitive deficits in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder – electroencephalography correlates

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive deficits in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder – electroencephalography correlates
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s93040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana Kamaradova, Miroslav Hajda, Jan Prasko, Jiri Taborsky, Ales Grambal, Klara Latalova, Marie Ociskova, Martin Brunovsky, Petr Hlustik

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with cognitive dysfunction. Although there are several studies focused on the neurobiology of OCD, little is known about the biological correlates of the cognitive deficit linked to this disorder. The aim of our study was to examine the association between cognitive impairment and current source density markers in patients with OCD. Resting-state eyes-closed electroencephalography (EEG) data were recorded in 20 patients with OCD and 15 healthy controls who were involved in the study. Cortical EEG sources were estimated by standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography in seven frequency bands: delta (1.5-6 Hz), theta (6.5-8 Hz), alpha-1 (8.5-10 Hz), alpha-2 (10.5-12 Hz), beta-1 (12.5-18 Hz), beta-2 (18.5-21 Hz), and beta-3 (21.5-30 Hz). Cognitive performance was measured by the Trail-Making Test (versions A and B), Stroop CW Test, and D2 Test. Frontal delta and theta EEG sources showed significantly higher activity in the whole group of patients with OCD (N=20) than in control subjects (N=15). Subsequent analysis revealed that this excess of low-frequency activity was present only in the subgroup of eleven patients with cognitive impairment (based on the performance in the Trail-Making Test - A). The subgroup of patients with normal cognitive functions (N=9) did not differ in cortical EEG sources from healthy controls. The present results suggest that frontal low-frequency cortical sources of resting-state EEG rhythms can distinguish groups of cognitively impaired and cognitively intact patients with OCD. Based on our results, future studies should consider whether the present methodological approach provides clinically useful information for the revelation of cognitive impairment in patients with OCD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Neuroscience 10 15%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,275,484
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#790
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,987
of 311,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#27
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.