↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical imaging and high-resolution ultrasonography in melanocytoma management

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Clinical imaging and high-resolution ultrasonography in melanocytoma management
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2010
DOI 10.2147/opth.s11891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Gologorsky, Amy C Schefler, Fiona J Ehlies, Paul A Raskauskas, Yolanda Pina, Basil K Williams, Timothy G Murray

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Librarian 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 71%
Unspecified 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,927
of 103,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.