↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The prevalence and risk factors of stroke in patients with chronic schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
The prevalence and risk factors of stroke in patients with chronic schizophrenia
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s106663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Liang, Jian Huang, Jingbin Tian, Yuanyuan Cao, Guoling Zhang, Chungang Wang, Ying Cao, Jianrong Li

Abstract

To investigate the stroke risk and risk factors in patients with chronic schizophrenia. This study was a large-sample, cross-sectional survey. A total of 363 patients with chronic schizophrenia were selected from the Changping Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Beijing, in August 2014. The patients were divided into either stroke group or control group based on the presence of stroke. Clinical evaluation included positive and negative syndrome scale assessment and a detailed questionnaire to collect the general information and disease-related conditions. The prevalence of stroke was 16.5% (60 cases). Stroke and control groups showed a significant difference in age, sex, smoking, combined medication, doses, negative factor score in positive and negative syndrome scale, body mass index, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure. Multivariate analysis showed that a number of factors are significantly related to stroke, including age, sex, smoking, combined medication, doses, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure. The prevalence of stroke is relatively higher in Chinese patients with chronic schizophrenia. Chronic schizophrenia patients are more likely to suffer from stroke; meanwhile, a number of risk factors were identified, including old age, female sex, smoking history, combined medication with a variety of drugs, high doses, obesity, and high blood pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Psychology 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,360
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,271
of 311,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#49
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.