| Title |
High cervical spinal cord stimulation for occipital neuralgia: a case series and literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s214314 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pavlos Texakalidis, Muhibullah S Tora, Purva Nagarajan, Orion P Keifer, Nicholas M Boulis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#420,059
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#55
of 1,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,508
of 346,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.