↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Measuring negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Measuring negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s107775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seung-Hwan Lee, Ji-Sun Kim, Seon-Kyeong Jang, Seon-Cheol Park, Jung-Seo Yi, Joong-Kyu Park, Jung Suk Lee, Kee-Hong Choi

Abstract

The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) is one of the validated interview measures of negative symptoms in psychotic disorders. The Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MPSR) is a self-report measure that assesses the motivation and pleasure domains of negative symptoms based on the CAINS. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of a Korean version of the MPSR. A total of 139 patients with schizophrenia completed the MPSR, CAINS, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and other measures of trait and cognitive function. The 15-item MPSR showed good internal consistency. In addition, it also had a good convergent validity with the Motivation and Pleasure subscale of the CAINS and the anhedonia/avolition subscale of the SANS. The scale was not associated with psychotic symptoms, agitation/mania, and depression/anxiety, and it showed good discriminant validity. MPSR scores were significantly correlated with Behavioral Activation System total score for trait measure. The Korean version of the MPSR is a notable self-report method for examining the severity of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,185,398
of 14,533,317 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,069
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,006
of 263,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#61
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,533,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.