| Title |
Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s220714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter C Taylor, Neil Betteridge, T Michelle Brown, John Woolcott, Alan J Kivitz, Cristiano Zerbini, Diane Whalley, Oyebimpe Olayinka-Amao, Connie Chen, Palle Dahl, Dario Ponce de Leon, David Gruben, Lara Fallon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 25% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 28% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,051,839
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#480
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,089
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.