The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Does Antiretroviral Therapy Packaging Matter? Perceptions and Preferences of Antiretroviral Therapy Packaging for People Living with HIV in Northern Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s238759 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Muiruri, Shelley A Jazowski, Seleman K Semvua, Francis P Karia, Brandon A Knettel, Leah L Zullig, Habib O Ramadhani, Blandina T Mmbaga, John A Bartlett, Hayden B Bosworth |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,456,539
of 26,448,463 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#190
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,518
of 483,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,448,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.