| Title |
Characterization of cortical source generators based on electroencephalography during tonic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s132909 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tine Maria Hansen, Esben Bolvig Mark, Søren Schou Olesen, Mikkel Gram, Jens Brøndum Frøkjær, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 11 | 23% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,597,131
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,173
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,267
of 316,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#56
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.