↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Older patients' experiences during care transition

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Older patients' experiences during care transition
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s97570
Pubmed ID
Authors

Else Cathrine Rustad, Bodil Furnes, Berit Seiger Cronfalk, Elin Dysvik

Abstract

A fragmented health care system leads to an increased demand for continuity of care across health care levels. Research indicates age-related differences during care transition, with the oldest patients having experiences and needs that differ from those of other patients. To meet the older patients' needs and preferences during care transition, professionals must understand their experiences. The purpose of the study was to explore how patients ≥80 years of age experienced the care transition from hospital to municipal health care services. The study has a descriptive, explorative design, using semistructured interviews. Fourteen patients aged ≥80 participated in the study. Qualitative content analysis was used to describe the individuals' experiences during care transition. Two complementary themes emerged during the analysis: "Participation depends on being invited to plan the care transition" and "Managing continuity of care represents a complex and challenging process". Lack of participation, insufficient information, and vague responsibilities among staff during care transition seemed to limit the continuity of care. The patients are the vulnerable part of the care transition process, although they possess important resources, which illustrate the importance of making their voice heard. Older patients are therefore likely to benefit from more intensive support. A tailored, patient-centered follow-up of each patient is suggested to ensure that patient preferences and continuity of care to adhere to the new situation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 34%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,194,588
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#599
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,409
of 311,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.