↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Salivary Cortisol, Subjective Stress and Quality of Sleep Among Female Healthcare Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Salivary Cortisol, Subjective Stress and Quality of Sleep Among Female Healthcare Professionals
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2020
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s229396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wegdan Bani-Issa, Hadia Radwan, Farah Al Marzooq, Shamsa Al Awar, Arwa M Al-Shujairi, Rani Samsudin, Wafa Khasawneh, Najla Albluwi

Abstract

Stress is globally recognised as a risk factor impacting workers' health and workplace safety. Women healthcare professionals are at risk for considerable stress given the demanding nature of their jobs and current working conditions. This study assessed levels of stress among women healthcare professionals using measures of their cortisol levels, subjective stress and quality of sleep. This study used a cross-sectional design. Data were collected from 335 apparently healthy adult women healthcare professionals working in the United Arab Emirates. Participants provided morning and bedtime saliva samples for analysis of their cortisol levels. The Perceived Stress Scale, Stress Symptoms Scale, Brief Coping Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used to assess perceived stress level, symptoms of stress, stress-coping strategies and sleep quality, respectively. In total, 121 (36.15%) women had impaired morning cortisol levels (below the normal range of 0.094-1.551 µg/dL) and 48 (14.3%) had impaired bedtime cortisol levels (above 0.359 µg/dL). Around 57% of women reported moderate levels of perceived stress, with the most frequently reported stress symptoms being heart rate and back/neck pain. Poor sleep quality was reported by around 60% of participating women. No significant association was found between cortisol and psychosocial measurements of stress or sleep quality. However, night shift and longer shift duration (more than 8 hrs) were significantly associated with impaired morning and bedtime cortisol levels (P ≥ 0.05). Impaired cortisol levels were strongly dependent on using adaptive coping strategies such as active coping, acceptance and seeking emotional support (P ≥ 0.05). Evaluating cortisol levels and subjective stress could help to identify groups with impaired response to stress and elevated cortisol levels. Our findings support the need to examine shift work patterns and stress coping strategies in women healthcare professionals to promote their health and productivity and maintain workplace safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Lecturer 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 52 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 56 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,069,113
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#484
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,990
of 450,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.