| Title |
Prophylactic Electroacupuncture on the Upper Cervical Segments Decreases Neuronal Discharges of the Trigeminocervical Complex in Migraine-Affected Rats: An in vivo Extracellular Electrophysiological Experiment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s226922 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhengyang Qu, Lu Liu, Luopeng Zhao, Xiaobai Xu, Zhijuan Li, Yupu Zhu, Chen Zhang, Xianghong Jing, Xiaoyu Wang, Bin Li, Claire Suiqing Zhang, Marc Fisher, Linpeng Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 55% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,980,258
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#527
of 1,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,518
of 464,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#15
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.