| Title |
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Primary Dysmenorrhea: An Overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s220523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michal Elboim-Gabyzon, Leonid Kalichman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Researcher | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 83 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 80 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#292,870
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#18
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,199
of 477,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them