| Title |
<p>Direct and Indirect Costs of Infectious Conjunctivitis in a Commercially Insured Population in the United States</p>
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s233486 |
| Authors |
Jay S Pepose, Sujata P Sarda, Wendy Y Cheng, Nora McCormick, Hoi Ching Cheung, Priyanka Bobbili, Corey Joseph, Mei Sheng Duh |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,070,496
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,442
of 3,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,990
of 450,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#48
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.