↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of the iLUX and the LipiFlow for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the iLUX and the LipiFlow for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s234008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Tauber, James Owen, Marc Bloomenstein, John Hovanesian, Mark A Bullimore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,982,386
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#119
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,276
of 470,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.