↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Liquid Biopsy to Determine Treatment Change in Patients with Her2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Liquid Biopsy to Determine Treatment Change in Patients with Her2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in Colombia
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, February 2020
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s220726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Sánchez-Calderón, Adriana Pedraza, Catalina Mancera Urrego, Aurelio Mejía-Mejía, Ana Lorena Montealegre-Páez, Sandra Perdomo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Other 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Unspecified 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 28 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 29 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#16,642,835
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#312
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,643
of 473,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.