↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparing Expert and Non-Expert Assessment of Patients Presenting with Neurological Symptoms to the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Expert and Non-Expert Assessment of Patients Presenting with Neurological Symptoms to the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2020
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s236160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolin Hoyer, Patrick Stein, Anne Ebert, Hans-Werner Rausch, Simon Nagel, Philipp Eisele, Angelika Alonso, Michael Platten, Kristina Szabo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Unspecified 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#16,733,516
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,719
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,291
of 470,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#34
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.