| Title |
Assessing methods of measuring medication adherence in chronically ill children–a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s200058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Al-Hassany, Sanne M Kloosterboer, Bram Dierckx, Birgit CP Koch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 199 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 81 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 87 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,947,179
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#315
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,266
of 365,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.