Title |
Magnetic nanoparticles for gene and drug delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s1608 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stuart C McBain, Humphrey HP Yiu, Jon Dobson |
Abstract |
Investigations of magnetic micro- and nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery began over 30 years ago. Since that time, major progress has been made in particle design and synthesis techniques, however, very few clinical trials have taken place. Here we review advances in magnetic nanoparticle design, in vitro and animal experiments with magnetic nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery, and clinical trials of drug targeting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 194 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 18 | 9% |
United States | 17 | 9% |
Canada | 7 | 4% |
Mexico | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Uruguay | 3 | 2% |
Colombia | 2 | 1% |
Paraguay | 2 | 1% |
Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 130 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 190 | 98% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 817 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 9 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Slovenia | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 11 | 1% |
Unknown | 783 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 194 | 24% |
Student > Master | 135 | 17% |
Researcher | 100 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 92 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 45 | 6% |
Other | 120 | 15% |
Unknown | 131 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 135 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 102 | 12% |
Engineering | 94 | 12% |
Materials Science | 86 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 8% |
Other | 175 | 21% |
Unknown | 163 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#252,039
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#11
of 4,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#430
of 98,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them