↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reliability and Validity of Self-Screening Tool for Hearing Loss in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and Validity of Self-Screening Tool for Hearing Loss in Older Adults
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2020
DOI 10.2147/cia.s238053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunghwa You, Woojae Han, Saea Kim, Sanga Maeng, Young Joon Seo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 15 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Psychology 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,407
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338,463
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#24
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.