| Title |
Eosinophilic esophagitis incidence in New Zealand: high but not increasing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceg.s216126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kavindu Weerasekera, Dalice Sim, Finbarr Coughlan, Stephen Inns |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,608,970
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#256
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,582
of 348,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.