The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||67%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||25||10%|
|Student > Master||19||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||19||8%|
|Student > Postgraduate||15||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||59||25%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||17||7%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||11||5%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||8||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
of 3,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 364,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,538 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.