The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Comparing Surf Lifeguards and Nurse Anesthetists’ Use of the i-gel Supraglottic Airway Device – An Observational Simulation Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oaem.s239040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Nørkjær, Mathilde Stærk, Kasper G Lauridsen, Tabita K Gallacher, Jakob B Løyche, Kristian Krogh, Bo Løfgren |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,054,962
of 26,105,177 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#77
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,420
of 399,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,105,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.