| Title |
Guide to detecting a potential recrudescence of onchocerciasis during the posttreatment surveillance period: the American paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research and reports in tropical medicine, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/rrtm.s30482 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ed Cupp, Frank Richards, Maria-Eugenia Grillet, Sauerbrey, Eberhard, Dominguez, Morales, Ault, Nicholls |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Research and reports in tropical medicine
#45
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,407
of 175,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and reports in tropical medicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.