| Title |
Dengue fever triggering systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Medical Case Reports Journal, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/imcrj.s50708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
SH Talib, Bhattu, R Bhattu, SG Deshpande, DB Dahiphale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,609,687
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#77
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,069
of 208,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.