↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Paradoxes in the Phenotype, Frequency and Roles of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells During HIV Infection

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Paradoxes in the Phenotype, Frequency and Roles of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells During HIV Infection
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), April 2020
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s248642
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muluneh Ademe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#23,689,447
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#297
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,508
of 400,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.