| Title |
Danish Register of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s99489 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Lange, Sandra Søgaard Tøttenborg, Anne Dichmann Sorknæs, Jørgen Steen Andersen, Mette Søgaard, Henrik Nielsen, Reimar Wernich Thomsen, Katrine Abildtrup Nielsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,126,698
of 24,375,780 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#318
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,074
of 329,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,375,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.