↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The Dual-Gate Lumen Model of Renal Monoamine Transport [Expression of Concern]

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
The Dual-Gate Lumen Model of Renal Monoamine Transport [Expression of Concern]
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2020
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s240069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, Thomas Uncini

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,712,649
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#553
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,272
of 396,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.