Title |
Nanotherapeutics in angiogenesis: synthesis and in vivo assessment of drug efficacy and biocompatibility in zebrafish embryos
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s20145 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jinping Cheng, Yan-Juan Gu, Yajun Wang, Shuk Han Cheng, Wing-Tak Wong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#264
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,417
of 136,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.