| Title |
Botulinum toxin type A for the management of glabellar rhytids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s6492 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Marie Tremaine, Jerry L McCullough |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#404
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,797
of 104,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.