| Title |
Electrospun gelatin/PCL and collagen/PLCL scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s61375 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Fu, Zhenling Liu, Bei Feng, Renjie Hu, Xiaomin He, Hao Wang, Meng Yin, Huimin Huang, Haibo Zhang, Wei Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 255 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 61 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 26 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,342
of 242,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#48
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.