| Title |
Scaffolds in vascular regeneration: current status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vascular Health and Risk Management, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/vhrm.s50536 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neelima Thottappillil, Prabha D Nair |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 60 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 76 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#126
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,038
of 359,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.