↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Impaired bone healing in multitrauma patients is associated with altered leukocyte kinetics after major trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inflammation Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Impaired bone healing in multitrauma patients is associated with altered leukocyte kinetics after major trauma
Published in
Journal of Inflammation Research, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/jir.s101064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Okan Bastian, Anne Kuijer, Leo Koenderman, Rebecca K. Stellato, Wouter W. van Solinge, Luke P.H. Leenen, Taco J. Blokhuis

Abstract

Animal studies have shown that the systemic inflammatory response to major injury impairs bone regeneration. It remains unclear whether the systemic immune response contributes to impairment of fracture healing in multitrauma patients. It is well known that systemic inflammatory changes after major trauma affect leukocyte kinetics. We therefore retrospectively compared the cellular composition of peripheral blood during the first 2 weeks after injury between multitrauma patients with normal (n=48) and impaired (n=32) fracture healing of the tibia. The peripheral blood-count curves of leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, and thrombocytes differed significantly between patients with normal and impaired fracture healing during the first 2 weeks after trauma (P-values were 0.0122, 0.0083, 0.0204, and <0.0001, respectively). Mean myeloid cell counts were above reference values during the second week after injury. Our data indicate that leukocyte kinetics differ significantly between patients with normal and impaired fracture healing during the first 2 weeks after major injury. This finding suggests that the systemic immune response to major trauma can disturb tissue regeneration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,374,585
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#335
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,426
of 334,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.