| Title |
Evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticle biocompatibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s17574 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Gavard, Hanini, Schmitt, Kacem, Chau, Ammar, Julie Gavard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,882
of 120,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.