| Title |
Biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and recurrence monitoring of non-small cell lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s142149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong Tang, Guibin Qiao, Enwu Xu, Yiwen Xuan, Ming Liao, Guilin Yin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,543,221
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#282
of 3,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,470
of 325,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#5
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.