| Title |
Spray-dried powders enhance vaginal siRNA delivery by potentially modulating the mucus molecular sieve structure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s87978 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Na Wu, Xinxin Zhang, Feifei Li, Tao Zhang, Yong Gan, Juan Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 24% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#524
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,015
of 276,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#11
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.