| Title |
Improved LFIAs for highly sensitive detection of BNP at point-of-care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s135735 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Gong, Jie Hu, Jane Ru Choi, Minli You, Yamin Zheng, Bo Xu, Ting Wen, Feng Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 12% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,449,088
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#524
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,402
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#8
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.