| Title |
Functionalized carbon nanotubes: biomedical applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s35832 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandhya Vardharajula, Sk Z Ali, Pooja M Tiwari, Erdal Eroğlu, Komal Vig, Vida A Dennis, Shree R Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 443 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 14% |
| Researcher | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 11% |
| Unknown | 120 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 73 | 16% |
| Engineering | 56 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 91 | 20% |
| Unknown | 134 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,076
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,219
of 190,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.