↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Increased serum levels of apoptosis in deficit syndrome schizophrenia patients: a preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Increased serum levels of apoptosis in deficit syndrome schizophrenia patients: a preliminary study
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s106993
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murat Beyazyüz, Tarkan Küfeciler, Leyla Bulut, Cüneyt Ünsal, Yakup Albayrak, Esra Soydaş Akyol, Saliha Baykal, Murat Kuloglu, Kenji Hashimoto

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a chronic and debilitating disorder, the etiology of which remains unclear. Apoptosis is a programmed cell death mechanism that might be implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. In this study, we aimed to compare the serum levels of apoptosis among deficit schizophrenia (DS) syndrome patients, nondeficit schizophrenia (NDS) patients, and healthy controls (HCs). After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 23 DS patients, 46 NDS patients, and 33 HCs were included in the study. The serum apoptosis levels were measured using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay with human monoclonal antibodies directed against DNA and histones. There was a significant difference among the three groups in terms of the levels of apoptosis (F 2,96=16.58; P<0.001). The serum apoptosis levels in the DS and NDS groups were significantly higher than those in the HC group. Furthermore, the serum apoptosis levels in the DS group were significantly higher than the levels in the NDS group. This study suggests that increased levels of apoptosis may be implicated in the pathophysiology of DS syndrome. However, further studies are needed to support the role of apoptosis in DS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Neuroscience 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,192
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,274
of 311,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#88
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.