| Title |
Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant: Improving Patient Outcomes with a Multidisciplinary Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Blood Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jbm.s206027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luisa Giaccone, Francesco Felicetti, Sara Butera, Danilo Faraci, Marco Cerrano, Margherita Dionisi Vici, Lucia Brunello, Nicoletta Fortunati, Enrico Brignardello, Benedetto Bruno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#229
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,206
of 410,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.