| Title |
Practical approach to a patient with chronic pain of uncertain etiology in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s205570 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaquir Salduker, Eugene Allers, Sudha Bechan, R Eric Hodgson, Fanie Meyer, Helgard Meyer, Johan Smuts, Eileen Vuong, David Webb |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,259,414
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#714
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,438
of 339,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.