↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Irreversible electroporation: state of the art

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Irreversible electroporation: state of the art
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s88086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter GK Wagstaff, Mara Buijs, Willemien van den Bos, Daniel M de Bruin, Patricia J Zondervan, Jean JMCH de la Rosette, M Pilar Laguna Pes

Abstract

The field of focal ablative therapy for the treatment of cancer is characterized by abundance of thermal ablative techniques that provide a minimally invasive treatment option in selected tumors. However, the unselective destruction inflicted by thermal ablation modalities can result in damage to vital structures in the vicinity of the tumor. Furthermore, the efficacy of thermal ablation intensity can be impaired due to thermal sink caused by large blood vessels in the proximity of the tumor. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablation modality based on the principle of electroporation or electropermeabilization, in which electric pulses are used to create nanoscale defects in the cell membrane. In theory, IRE has the potential of overcoming the aforementioned limitations of thermal ablation techniques. This review provides a description of the principle of IRE, combined with an overview of in vivo research performed to date in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and prostate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 25%
Engineering 27 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Materials Science 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 43 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,346,991
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#496
of 3,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,946
of 315,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#21
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.