| Title |
N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Antagonists and Steroids for the Prevention of Persisting Post-Surgical Pain After Thoracoscopic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled, Factorial Design, International, Multicenter Pilot Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s237058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harsha Shanthanna, Alparslan Turan, Jessica Vincent, Remie Saab, Yaron Shargall, Turlough O’Hare, Kimberly Davis, Sylvanus Fonguh, Kumar Balasubramaniam, James Paul, Ian Gilron, Henrik Kehlet, Daniel I Sessler, Mohit Bhandari, Lehana Thabane, PJ Devereaux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,609,465
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,175
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,293
of 451,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.