Title |
Evidence-based decision-making within the context of globalization: A “Why–What–How” for leaders and managers of health care organizations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.2147/rmhp.s4845 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Véronique Lapaige |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 81 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,267,193
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#124
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,174
of 94,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them