Title |
Confluent and reticulated papillomatosis: diagnostic and treatment challenges
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s92051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joel Hua-Liang Lim, Hong Liang Tey, Wei-Sheng Chong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 22% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 63% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,456,080
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#225
of 916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,278
of 381,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.