↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Status of, and strategies for improving, adherence to HCC screening and surveillance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Status of, and strategies for improving, adherence to HCC screening and surveillance
Published in
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/jhc.s159269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giampiero Francica, Mauro Borzio

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 18 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,611,052
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#76
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,559
of 348,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them