↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The impact of a regional patient-centered medical home initiative on cost of care among commercially insured population in the US

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
The impact of a regional patient-centered medical home initiative on cost of care among commercially insured population in the US
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s102826
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Dukjae Maeng, Joann P Sciandra, Janet F Tomcavage

Abstract

The impact of a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) in reducing total cost of care remains a subject of debate, particularly among the non-elderly adult population. This study examines a 6-year experience of a large integrated regional health care delivery system in the US implementing PCMH among its commercially insured population. A regional health plan's claims data from 2008 through 2013 among its commercially insured members were obtained and analyzed. Over the 6-year period, the PCMH implementation beyond the first 6 months of exposure was associated with a lower total cost of care of ∼9% (P<0.05). The largest reduction was observed in outpatient costs (12%; P<0.05). This study suggests that PCMH implementation among the non-elderly adult population can potentially lead to cost savings. Future studies are necessary to identify the drivers of the cost savings and examine if similar results can be replicated elsewhere by other health care delivery systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 31%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Social Sciences 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,226,235
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#161
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,140
of 298,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.