↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Obesity, knee osteoarthritis, and polypathology: factors favoring weight loss in older people

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Obesity, knee osteoarthritis, and polypathology: factors favoring weight loss in older people
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s92183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pilar Isla Pera, Mª Carmen Olivé Ferrér, Montserrat Nuñez Juarez, Esther Nuñez Juarez, Loreto Maciá Soler, Carmen López Matheu, Assumpta Rigol Cuadra, María Honrubia Pérez, Diana Marre

Abstract

We aimed to explore the meaning of obesity in elderly persons with knee osteoarthritis (KO) and to determine the factors that encourage or discourage weight loss. Various studies have demonstrated that body mass index is related to KO and that weight loss improves symptoms and functional capacity. However, dietary habits are difficult to modify and most education programs are ineffective. A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted. Intentional sampling was performed in ten older persons with KO who had lost weight and improved their health-related quality of life after participating in a health education program. A thematic content analysis was conducted following the stages proposed by Miles and Huberman. Participants understood obesity as a risk factor for health problems and stigma. They believed that the cause of obesity was multifactorial and criticized health professionals for labeling them as "obese" and for assigning a moral value to slimness and diet. The factors identified as contributing to the effectiveness of the program were a tolerant attitude among health professionals, group education that encouraged motivation, quantitative dietary recommendations, and a meaningful learning model based on social learning theories. Dietary self-management without prohibitions helped participants to make changes in the quantity and timing of some food intake and to lose weight without sacrificing some foods that were deeply rooted in their culture and preferences. Dietary education programs should focus on health-related quality of life and include scientific knowledge but should also consider affective factors and the problems perceived as priorities by patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Psychology 10 8%
Unspecified 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,309,599
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#812
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,238
of 312,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#34
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.