↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section: a systematic review update

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section: a systematic review update
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s132391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman D Goldstuck, Petrus S Steyn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 24 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 42%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,310,527
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#552
of 886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,936
of 323,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.