↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Attentional Bias Toward Cupping Therapy Marks: An Eye-Tracking Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Attentional Bias Toward Cupping Therapy Marks: An Eye-Tracking Study
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, May 2020
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s252675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minyoung Hong, In-Seon Lee, Dha-Hyun Choi, Younbyoung Chae

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Psychology 3 12%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,729,433
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,420
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,018
of 378,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#36
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.