Title |
Attentional Bias Toward Cupping Therapy Marks: An Eye-Tracking Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s252675 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Minyoung Hong, In-Seon Lee, Dha-Hyun Choi, Younbyoung Chae |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philippines | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 23% |
Psychology | 3 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,729,433
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,420
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,018
of 378,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#36
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.